Red Wine-Heart Researcher Charged With Fraud

A scientist responsible for studying the link between aging and resveratrol, found in red wine, has been accused of committing more than 100 acts of data fabrication and falsification, according to Reuters.

Dipak K. Das, who directed the University of Connecticut’s Cardiovascular Research Center, has been outed  by the university after it discovered the information. The university says it received an anonymous tip that led to an investigation beginning in 2008.

UConn was offered $890,000 in federal grants awarded to Das for his research, but declined to accept them in light of the new information. The university notified 11 scholarly journals – including Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, where Das was an editor-in-chief – that published the research.

Photo by Flickr user Stella Blu


Subscribe To Food Manufacturing’s Free Newsletter

Like Us On Facebook

Follow Food Manufacturing On Twitter

Advertisements

The Average American Ate A Ton Last Year

According to NPR, the average American literally ate a ton of food last year, with most of the food consisting of cheese, sweets, potatoes and grains. The data, provided by the USDA, indicated that we each consume about 630 pounds of dairy per year and 185 pounds of meat and poultry. Americans consumed 273 pounds of fruit and 415 pounds of vegetables, but the majority of vegetables were starch-heavy corn and potatoes.

All that is topped off with 141 pounds of sweetener, including 42 pounds of corn syrup, and 85 pounds of fats. The USDA estimates the average American eats nearly 2,700 calories per day, which is significantly higher than the 2,000 recommended for an average person.

Photo by Flickr user rob_rob2001


Subscribe To Food Manufacturing’s Free Newsletter

Like Us On Facebook

Follow Food Manufacturing On Twitter

Is Your Favorite Seasonal Food On The Naughty List?

Huffington Post recently released it’s ‘Naughty & Nice’ list of this year’s seasonal restaurant items, which includes everything from a gingerbread martini to red velvet hot chocolate. While some of these concoctions look rather tasty, some should go straight to the top of the naughty list.


Subscribe To Food Manufacturing’s Free Newsletter

Like Us On Facebook

Follow Food Manufacturing On Twitter

Giving Packaging A Clean Bill Of Health

Lindsey Coblentz, Associate Editor

Health foods have become a booming business, but nutrition experts say food companies should take care, lest their products be viewed as more hype than wholesome.

A recent study indicates that selling “better-for-you” foods and beverages generally results in higher profits. The study conducted by the Hudson Institute and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation found that foods perceived as healthier made up nearly 40 percent of sales and generated upwards of 70 percent of sales growth. In fact, food manufacturers that focus on expanding sales of healthy items are experiencing more than twice the average rate of growth of companies selling mainly traditional products.

As this sector continues to expand, more and more food processors are incorporating good-for-you items into their product lines. But consumer advocates are concerned that some businesses eager to tap into the health market may be labeling products with misleading nutrition claims.

The Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) recently filed suit against General Mills, alleging the company is intentionally misleading consumers about the healthfulness of its fruit snacks. General Mills’ fruit snacks line includes items such as Fruit Roll-Ups, Fruit by the Foot and Gushers. Claims like a “good source of Vitamin C,” low-calorie and low in fat are featured on many of the snack packages.

CSPI says that while these statements may be accurate, they are tricking shoppers into purchasing a sugary candy with little nutritional value. The organization’s complaint says, “In fact, Defendant’s Fruit Snacks contained trans fat, added sugars and artificial food dyes; lacked significant amounts of real, natural fruit; and had no dietary fiber.”

This isn’t the first such complaint General Mills has faced. The company felt the heat from the Food and Drug Administration when the agency forced General Mills to discontinue deceptive cholesterol and cancer-prevention claims on its Cheerios cereal in 2009.

With regard to the fruit snacks complaint, General Mills released the following statement: “We stand behind our products, and we stand behind the accuracy of the labeling of those products.”

That General Mills’ labels are accurate is not in dispute, but accuracy is not the issue at hand in this case. For instance, the fruit snacks in question may be a good source of Vitamin C, but the vitamin can be added to products in order improve their health value, rather than appearing naturally in a product’s ingredients. The potential problem with a nutrient declaration on “junk food” is that currently the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) does not permit nutrients to be added to food that would otherwise be considered unhealthy or of limited nutritional value.

In addition to the FDA’s guidance on added nutrients, the agency also requires that health claims related to disease prevention be proven through scientific evidence. General Mills’ past run-in with the agency over its cholesterol and cancer claims most likely resulted from a lack of scientific studies showing that Cheerios, in fact, produced these positive effects.

Food companies should take advantage of the growing health market, but they should, at the same time, be cautious in their approach. When incorporating a new health product or enhancing the healthfulness of an existing item, manufacturers must take the time to review existing regulatory requirements before incorporating health claims or nutrient declarations on product packaging.

Reviewing health labeling requirements will help ensure businesses stay within the confines of governmental guidance — and customers will feel more certain they are getting what they pay for.

How do you feel about health claim requirements? Are they too strict, just right or could they be improved upon? Let me know at lindsey.coblentz@advantagemedia.com.


Subscribe To Food Manufacturing’s Free Newsletter

Like Us On Facebook

Follow Food Manufacturing On Twitter

Cheese Not So Bad For Cholesterol, After All

New research released by Danish scientists, and sponsored by the Danish dairy industry, has found that cheese and butter affect LDL (bad) cholesterol levels differently. The study tested 50 people over several months, with some consuming butter and others cheese.

The research indicated that butter eaters experienced a 7 percent increase in their LDL cholesterol levels, while cheese eaters experienced no LDL change. Scientists say this may be due to the higher calcium in cheese, but more research needs to be done.

Photo by Flickr user WindwalkerNld, obtained from www.fotopedia.com


Subscribe To Food Manufacturing’s Free Newsletter

Like Us On Facebook

Follow Food Manufacturing On Twitter